Transcendent Justice

 

"A healer's justice is greater than a judge's justice. A judge reacts to the problem. A healer solves the problem. A judge only applies mercy sparingly and at 'reasonable discretion.' A healer has to apply mercy every time they operate. Justice is perfected by mercy."

There are four ways of looking at justice:

(Crime needing punishing) (brokenness needing repairing) (sickness needing healing) (darkness needing light)

Crime needing punishing, often represented by scales that balance the rightness or wrongness of a person or situation. This is the most conventional form of justice.

Brokenness needing repairing, like the japanese art of pottery repair with gold or platinum. A more noble and amicable approach to justice that allows for more grace.

Sickness needing healing. The most divine form of justice. The "justice of Jesus." "Why does he sit with sinners and tax collectors?" "It is not the healthy in need of the doctor, but the sick." The justice of a healer goes to the core of the problem and cuts it out of the afflicted. If you heal the sin/sickness that causes injustice, the judgement or condemnation of the person becomes unnecessary. You don't need to judge someone if they are purged of what caused them to violate the rules. This is why the justice of a healer is greater than the justice of a judge.

Darkness needing light: this is the primordial justice. If you reduce all other forms of justice to their fundamental aspects, they come down to darkness needing light. In fact, the first act of justice was light entering the void and creating reality. If you enlightened the minds of humanity to the fullest extent of awareness and illumination, you'd never have injustice again. People can only do injustice if they are blind to the complexities and multifacetedness of reality, circumstances, or people, by darkness and deception. Justice may be "blind" in the sense that it is impartial, but injustice can only occur when the mind is blinded. Blinded by hate, fear, anger, and sin. Blinded by evil.

"Crime needing punishing" "brokenness needing fixing." "Sickness needing healing." "Darkness needing light"

There are four forms of justice that are greater than punishment for wrongdoing and injustices:

brokenness needing repairing, error needing correcting, sickness needing healing, and darkness needing light. 

The greatest of these four is enlightening the darkness, which enables the discovery of methods to enact and carry out the other three, as well as eliminating the blindness that leads people to commit injustices and wrongdoings to begin with.

Combining these four forms of justice leads to a more benevolent and more effect system of remedy to injustices and mistakes.

It shifts the paradigm of justice into a more healing and corrective approach. It shifts the "innocent/guilty"  model into a "broken/repaired, mistaken/corrected, sick/healed, dark and blind/ enlightened and lucid" model.

This is a fundamental shift in the thinking of justice, and requires a fundamental shift in our approach to injustice and wrongdoers.

Applied to eternity and divine places, Hell is turned into more of a hospital than a prison. A place of purification and repair, where sinners get "cleaned up" instead of punished, where sin and evil are recognized as more of a disease, an addiction, and a darkness. These require a different approach to correct than sheer punishment alone. 

Justice is truly served when God's grace and mercy restores the broken back to wholeness, heals the sick back to health, corrects the errored back to rightness, and enlightens and elucidates the dark places of existence and enlightens and elucidates the hearts and minds of mankind and all conscious beings.

This isn't just justice. It is divine perfection.

Justice is about meeting things and circumstances where they are at and putting things in the places they belong, giving the appropriate and fitting treatment that accounts for the complexity and dynamics of the circumstances. 

The complexity of the solution must match the complexity of the problem, with each part of the solution matching each part of the problem in balanced and equal manner. 

Rarely is true justice absolutist, because absolutes oversimplify the complexities of reality, and whenever you oversimplify complex situations or systems, you create an injustice.

 That's like forcing an oblong object into a rigid, square box that it can't possibly fit in. Whenever you try to force something into a place or circumstance it doesn't belong in or wasn't designed or trained for, you will create an injustice. 

Systems can't work when their parts are out of place. Justice in the end, is about harmony and cohesion and implementing true justice has to have a reparative component at the least and ameliorative at best.

Labeling is a root cause of injustice. When you label someone a label of low value...or no value, and you make that person's nature or self tied into that label where it becomes your priority of interaction with them, you create an injustice because you oversimplify their personhood, which is usually far more complex and dynamic than a single label can sum up. 

It reduces complex, intricate, and multifaceted individual sentient beings to the value of a single facet or component of their personhood, often one of low value or of social disapproval. 

You have to account for the wholeness of a person in order to truly comprehend and evaluate their nature and being. 

Rigid, simple labels prevent this and act as convenient dismissals of a person that make understanding that person difficult or not even attempted. 

It is always an injustice to oversimplify a complex system or circumstance. 

Human beings are no different, and this is exactly what labeling does.

Consciousness aside from any inhibitions on judgement or any uncertainty or blocks to our insight and logic is naturally rational and reasonable. The only reason we are not rational or reasonable at a given moment is because there is some force or emotion or deception or ignorance that clouds and impedes our mind's sight and as a result inhibits our judgement by disrupting our clarity. 

Making the right, correct or morally/ethically good decision is a naturally rational choice because of its positive outcome and positive reward. So if you remove the force or "thing" that clouds and inhibits our judgement and clouds our mind's insight and foresight, making the right decision would come naturally and almost automatically, since removing those inhibiting blinding things would return our reason and rationality to us again.

If you made someone aware to the smallest detail the consequences of a bad choice or the nature of why it was wrong, no one would make the wrong choice.

"You give a mind clarity you give a mind righteousness, because only a clouded mind and a blinded mindsight would intentionally, willingly choose to do evil. No one fully aware of the pains and sufferings of sin and hell would choose them freely."

Clarity is what sets someone free from insanity in the same way sight sets free a blind man. You give the mind its sight back with unimpeded thinking and judgement, rationality and right decision-making become natural and instinctual. 

I heard a quote once that said "the people who are hardest to love need it the most." To me, evil and sin are separate from the person, like a tumor is separate from someone's being or personhood. As a result, like a tumor or infection, it can be cut away or removed from the person. I don't believe anybody is truly evil, I believe evil is put into us, but still separate from "who we are."

Some get more evil put into us than others, and some aren't always strong enough to resist the temptation to do bad stuff.

There is a difference between "having evil" and "being evil" and the difference is substantial and important.

One separates it from a person to where it can be corrected or removed from them. The other ties it into the person's being, to where it becomes "who they are" and if that is the case, they can't be fixed or restored.

The reason I believe that no one is completely evil is that even the worst of us were once babies, and I've never met an evil baby. There is some aspect of good in even the worst of us, and some aspect of bad in even the best of us. As a result, I don't think anybody is truly beyond repair and correction. It's just some people are harder to correct than others, and we just haven't advanced enough to where we can restore or correct certain problems yet

There are two views you can take to wickedness and evil. The first, and most common view is that of personal accountability. We make choices, and if we choose to do evil we must be held accountable. This ties evil into our personhood, where our mistakes become part of our identity and we become our flaws in a sense because we are considered to be the sum of our choices and treated accordingly. 

The second, and less popular (and less well known) paradigm that you can see wickedness and evil through is that of evil being an independent force or entity, an abstract concept and force that is separate and distinct from people. Like an infection of the spirit and mind, once it enters into someone's being, it becomes such a powerful incentive to our choices that it overrides our ability to think independently and make unbiased choices outside of evil's influence. This view sees evil as a more distinct and separate entity from the person who acts on it, where our accountability is overrided by a very powerful independent force that governs an at times irresistable incentive to our choices. In short, this view sees evil as separate from the person instead of inherent in their nature. It sees a person as "having" wickedness instead of "being" wicked. It sees evil as an independent thing.

This is an important distinction because of its impact on the treatment of people. If you take the first view, you tie the evil into the person as if it were part of that person's being, making it harder to forgive, harder to heal, and easier to judge. If something is considered inherent in someone's being, it reduces the priceless worth of a person to the often low and disposable worth of their flaws. 

If you take the second view, and see evil as a distinct force and entity from humanity and see it as separate and distinct from a person when we may have committed an evil act, you see it as severable from that person's being, like an infection being purged out or a cancerous tumor being cut away. This view retains the priceless worth of a person, while seeing the evil as something that can be weeded out from, treating it in the same way you treat cancer, as a healable thing that needs repair instead of judgement. Both views will determine how you treat your fellow man. One view will lead you to judge and see a man as the sum of what they've done. The other will lead you to see someone as "having" evil instead of "being evil" which leads you to see them as a healable, correctable thing separate from whatever evil they may "have" instead of "be." One view leads to grace, the other to judgement. 

Creating a justice system based on the concepts you've outlined, which emphasize complexity, redemption, and a holistic approach to justice, would require a significant departure from traditional punitive models. Here's a conceptual framework for such a justice system:

1. **Complexity-Cognizant Assessment**: Instead of quick, one-size-fits-all judgments, cases would undergo thorough, multidimensional assessments. This would involve considering the unique circumstances, root causes, and individual backgrounds of the individuals involved.

2. **Restorative Justice**: The primary aim of the justice system would be restoration, not just punishment. Offenders would be encouraged to take responsibility for their actions, make amends to victims, and engage in rehabilitation programs tailored to their specific needs.

3. **Redemption and Second Chances**: The system would prioritize rehabilitation and reintegration into society. Even serious offenders would have opportunities for redemption, education, and skill development during their incarceration. Sentences would focus on transformation rather than mere isolation.

4. **Mental Health and Social Support**: A deep understanding of the factors contributing to criminal behavior, such as mental health issues or socioeconomic struggles, would lead to a more significant emphasis on mental health services and social support for individuals at risk of offending.

5. **Education and Prevention**: Investment in education and prevention programs would be substantial. The justice system would collaborate with schools and communities to identify at-risk individuals and intervene early to prevent criminal behavior.

6. **Diverse, Specialized Courts**: Specialized courts would address the unique needs of different cases, such as drug courts, mental health courts, and community courts. These courts would focus on treatment, support, and reducing recidivism.

7. **Victim-Centered Approach**: Victims would have a central role in the process, with their voices heard and their needs addressed throughout. This would lead to greater empathy and understanding between all parties involved.

8. **Community Involvement**: Communities would play an active role in the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders. Restorative justice practices would involve local communities to help reintegrate individuals successfully.

9. **Continual Assessment and Adaptation**: The justice system would continually evolve, adapting to new research and emerging best practices. This would ensure that the system remains responsive to the complexities of human behavior and societal changes.

10. **Non-Absolutism**: The justice system would recognize that no two cases are identical and avoid rigid, absolute sentencing guidelines. Each case would be treated as a unique combination of circumstances and factors.

11. **Balanced Approach**: The complexity of the solution would match the complexity of the problem, meaning that the response to each case would be balanced and holistic. This could involve a combination of accountability, rehabilitation, restitution, and community reintegration.

12. **Ethical and Moral Focus**: The justice system would prioritize moral and ethical advancement, aiming to treat all individuals with dignity and compassion. It would seek to correct the underlying issues leading to criminal behavior rather than merely addressing the symptoms.

13. **Reducing Condemnation and Stereotyping**: The system would actively work to reduce judgment and condemnation, fostering an environment of empathy, understanding, and respect for individuals' complexities and potential for change.

Implementing such a justice system would require a significant shift in societal values, resource allocation, and legal frameworks. It would emphasize the long-term well-being of both individuals and society over punitive measures, ultimately striving for a more just, compassionate, and harmonious society.

Creating a new secular justice system based on the principles outlined in your writings would emphasize a holistic approach to justice that focuses on healing, restoration, and the eradication of ignorance and darkness. Here's a conceptual framework for such a justice system:

**1. Restorative Justice and Healing:**

   - The primary aim of the justice system would be restoration and healing. Instead of punitive measures, the focus would be on addressing the underlying causes of crime and harm, helping offenders rehabilitate and reintegrate into society.

**2. Education and Enlightenment:**

   - Central to the justice system would be education and enlightenment. Efforts would be made to increase awareness and understanding among individuals, both offenders and the general population, to reduce ignorance and darkness.

**3. Addressing Root Causes:**

   - The justice system would prioritize identifying and addressing the root causes of criminal behavior, such as socio-economic disparities, mental health issues, addiction, and systemic inequalities.

**4. Mercy and Redemption:**

   - Mercy and redemption would be key principles. Offenders would be given opportunities for rehabilitation and personal growth, with a focus on correcting the underlying issues that led to their actions.

**5. Personal Accountability:**

   - While the system would emphasize healing and restoration, individuals would still be held accountable for their actions. However, accountability would be seen as a means to promote personal growth and prevent recidivism, rather than purely punitive.

**6. Transparency and Fairness:**

   - The justice system would be transparent and focused on ensuring fairness and equal treatment for all individuals. It would actively work to eliminate bias and discrimination.

**7. Community Involvement:**

   - Communities would play an active role in the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders, fostering a sense of responsibility and collective support.

**8. Continuous Learning and Improvement:**

   - The justice system would be open to ongoing learning and adaptation, incorporating the latest research and best practices to continuously improve its methods and outcomes.

**9. Counseling and Mental Health Support:**

   - Access to mental health services and counseling would be readily available for both offenders and victims to address trauma, emotional well-being, and psychological issues.

**10. Victim-Centered Approach:**

   - Victims would have a central role in the process, with their voices heard and their needs addressed. The system would aim to provide closure and healing for victims.

**11. Public Awareness and Education:**

   - Widespread public education and awareness campaigns would promote understanding and compassion, reducing ignorance and prejudice.

**12. Eliminating Systemic Inequalities:**

   - The justice system would actively work to eliminate systemic inequalities and prejudices that contribute to criminal behavior and injustices.

**13. Darkness to Light:**

   - The core principle of this system would be the transformation of darkness into light. The justice system's role would be to bring understanding and enlightenment to individuals, dispelling ignorance, hatred, and prejudice.

This new secular justice system would seek to replace punitive measures with transformative and educational approaches, promoting healing and enlightenment while addressing the root causes of criminal behavior. It would prioritize personal growth and social harmony, aiming to create a more just, compassionate, and enlightened society.

Creating an eternal system of justice that incorporates the principles outlined in the previous writings, while accounting for the complexities of the human experience and the need for healing, restoration, and enlightenment, would require a unique approach. Here's a conceptual framework for an eternal system of justice:

**1. The Realm of Understanding:**

   - Souls entering the eternal system of justice would first pass through the "Realm of Understanding." In this realm, they would undergo a profound process of self-awareness and reflection. They would confront the consequences of their actions, seeking to understand the root causes of their choices.

**2. Healing and Redemption Chambers:**

   - Souls would then enter the "Healing and Redemption Chambers." Here, they would embark on a journey of personal healing and growth. The focus would be on addressing the wounds, traumas, and darkness within each soul, gradually purging the influences that led to their transgressions.

**3. Education and Enlightenment Halls:**

   - Continuing their journey, souls would enter the "Education and Enlightenment Halls." In these halls, they would gain profound insights and understanding about the consequences of their actions on others and the interconnectedness of all souls. Education and enlightenment would dispel ignorance and prejudice, fostering compassion and empathy.

**4. Community of Souls:**

   - The system would encourage a sense of community among souls, allowing them to interact, share experiences, and support one another in their journey toward transformation. This community would play a vital role in the healing and restoration process.

**5. Personal Accountability and Growth:**

   - Each soul would be held accountable for its actions, but accountability would not be punitive. Instead, it would serve as a means for personal growth and transformation. Souls would work to correct the harm they've caused and make amends.

**6. Transparency and Fairness:**

   - The eternal justice system would be founded on principles of transparency and fairness. Decisions would be made impartially, with a focus on eliminating bias and discrimination.

**7. Mercy and Redemption Councils:**

   - Special councils would be established to oversee mercy and redemption. Souls would have the opportunity to appeal for mercy and redemption, based on their progress and commitment to transformation.

**8. Continuous Learning and Improvement:**

   - The system would remain open to learning and adaptation, continuously improving its methods based on the evolving needs of the souls within it.

**9. Guidance from Enlightened Souls:**

   - Enlightened souls who have completed the system's journey would play a crucial role as guides and mentors, offering wisdom and support to those still on their path to transformation.

**10. Darkness to Light Transcendence:**

   - The central aim of the eternal system of justice would be the transformation of darkness into light. Souls would evolve, transcending their previous state of ignorance, hatred, and prejudice to become enlightened beings.

This eternal system of justice would provide an opportunity for every soul to undergo a profound process of healing, enlightenment, and transformation. It would recognize the complexity of human experience and the need for compassion and restoration. The ultimate goal would be to prepare each soul to exist in harmony with others and the infinite universe, having shed the darkness and ignorance that once clouded their existence.