Retributive Justice Vs. Restorative Justice
"An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind." -Ghandi It is far more ethical, far more noble, far more righteous, and far more just to restore and correct than destroy and throw away. It preserves the dignity and value of a person and makes them useful and productive instead of wasted potential. Restoration addresses the most important part of justice and injustice; causality. When you restore or correct, you are finding a solution to a cause of a problem that is effective, ethical, and useful instead of just a reaction to it. Retributive justice is purely reaction-based. When someone does something wrong, you punish them for the sake of punishment alone with no intention to actually fix the cause of the problem or violation. It is often merciless and rarely impartial, and it leads to more of a throwing away than a redemption or restoration. It often feeds off of hatred and can be quite oppressive. In fact, retributive justice has...